Asus B85M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus B85M-E  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180404
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateMay 05 '21 at 21:55
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 69%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 129
54% 87.7 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 279
30% 231 Pts
64-Core 276
18% 276 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$230
Asus(1043 85B0) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51% Above average
Lighting 62.4
Reflection 64.9
Parallax 59.1
50% 62.1 fps
MRender 64.1
Gravity 64
Splatting 60
52% 62.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$34
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 303
Write 107
Mixed 148
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 22.4
84% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 112
89% 122 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 72%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$40
136GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 149 156 150 160 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 88.3
Write 86.7
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 152
63% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 107%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
89GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 37 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 34
Write 34
Mixed 24
SusWrite 36.8
44% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 99U5471-047.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.9% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 6.4
22% 7.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical B85M-E Builds (Compare 3,647 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-E - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $320
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $277Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback