Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '21 at 06:01
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-920-$249
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 125
58% 91.2 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 329
36% 279 Pts
64-Core 334
22% 334 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 3769) 2GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.3% Poor
Lighting 30.8
Reflection 32.6
Parallax 39.6
25% 34.3 fps
MRender 41.7
Gravity 30.2
Splatting 33
26% 35 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 30%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$110
763GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 563 258 262 259 257 260 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 84% Great: 138%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.7% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 16.3
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 10.9
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-EX58-UD4P Builds (Compare 425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $479
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $300Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback