| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 40.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H410M S2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20201210 |
| Uptime | 1.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 08 '21 at 06:41 |
| Run Duration | 119 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 25% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
74.5%
Very good
|
78% 142 Pts
|
67% 559 Pts
|
59% 948 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Zotac(19DA 2595) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.8%
Average
|
41% 49.9 fps
|
41% 51.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 53 61 49 30 51 MB/s
|
36.1%
Below average
|
52% 236 MB/s
|
41% 10.7 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 130 131 131 135 MB/s
|
75.4%
Very good
|
86% 117 MB/s
|
193% 1.47 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CB8GU2666.C8JT 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
38.1%
Below average
|
39% 13.7 GB/s
|
24% 8.4 GB/s
|
43% 93.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H410M S2 Builds (Compare 887 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H410M S2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 298x |
| Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples | 293x |
| Core i3-10100Intel $94Bench 80%, 24,563 samples | 97x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 79x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 72x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 66x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $201 |