Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive0.54% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 10:36
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 42.1
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 192
58% 111 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 382
48% 363 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 200B) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.5% Above average
Lighting 63.2
Reflection 65.8
Parallax 60.4
52% 63.1 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 64.5
Splatting 60
52% 63.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S064G 63GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 2.1 3.9 5.8 16 12 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
0.54% Terrible
Read 2.5
Write 2
Mixed 3.7
SusWrite 6.7
1% 3.72 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 47%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
466GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 907 392 412 420 427 413 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,129
Write 1,248
Mixed 921
SusWrite 495
213% 948 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 41.2
153% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 819
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 571
439% 608 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 150%
Great: 237%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
205GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 89 89 88 89 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 79.2
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 86.3
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 59%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 64GB-$25
58GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 22 21 22 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 38.2
Write 20.6
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 22.1
34% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 2.2
439% 6.47 MB/s
DQ Read 9.4
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 2.5
491% 7.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G KHX2666C15D4/8G 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 30.2
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 22.4
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,628 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $393
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback