Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive0.54% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '21 at 10:36
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 42.1
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 184
58% 108 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 344
46% 337 Pts
64-Core 373
25% 373 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$230
Asus(1043 200B) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.6% Above average
Lighting 63.2
Reflection 65.8
Parallax 60.4
51% 63.1 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 64.5
Splatting 60
52% 63.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S064G 63GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 2.1 3.9 5.8 16 12 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
0.54% Terrible
Read 2.5
Write 2
Mixed 3.7
SusWrite 6.7
1% 3.72 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 47%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
466GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 907 392 412 420 427 413 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,129
Write 1,248
Mixed 921
SusWrite 495
213% 948 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 41.2
153% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 819
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 571
439% 608 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 150%
Great: 240%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$152
205GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 89 89 88 89 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 79.2
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 86.3
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 60%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 64GB-$25
58GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 22 21 22 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 38.2
Write 20.6
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 22.1
34% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 2.2
439% 6.47 MB/s
DQ Read 9.4
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 2.5
491% 7.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G KHX2666C15D4/8G 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 30.2
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 22.4
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 25,167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $506
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $96SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback