Asus P8H77-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-V  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141027
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateMay 09 '21 at 02:03
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 73%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 101
2-Core 199
78% 130 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 158
42% 270 Pts
64-Core 313
21% 313 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 33.7
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 37.3
27% 36.5 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 36.7
Splatting 25.8
30% 33.4 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 35%
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 84CA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.33% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 2.2
1% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.33%
Great: 2%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-256 256GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 83 67 87 61 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 366
Write 322
Mixed 153
SusWrite 78.6
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 19.2
46% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 52.2
DQ Write 33.4
DQ Mixed 14.8
19% 33.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST3160211AS 160GB
19GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 62 61 63 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 52
Write 10.7
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 62
27% 37 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 40%
Maxtor 6B200M0 204GB-$81
37GB free
Firmware: BANC1980
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 44 43 44 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 36.8
Write 43.4
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 43.4
28% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.5
125% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.7% Average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 14.6
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8H77-V Builds (Compare 1,652 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $797
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback