MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160719
Uptime6.3 Days
Run DateMay 10 '21 at 20:44
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 220
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 682
67% 546 Pts
64-Core 832
52% 832 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.2% Above average
Lighting 67.7
Reflection 74.7
Parallax 67.4
55% 69.9 fps
MRender 65.6
Gravity 70
Splatting 66.5
55% 67.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFZ10.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 72 5.4 66 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 428
Write 87.1
Mixed 132
SusWrite 41.5
37% 172 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.5
5% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21%
Great: 89%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
656GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 416 418 411 417 405 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 418
Write 410
Mixed 391
SusWrite 414
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 46.4
156% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 357
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
666GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 121 124 125 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 120
Write 119
Mixed 84.7
SusWrite 123
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
95.1% Outstanding
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 33.5
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 18.2
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $371
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback