Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	68.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	16.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210319
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 11 '21 at 22:17
Run Duration	223 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10940X 1,827 User benchmarks, average bench 86% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Memory 77.1 1-Core 147 2-Core 288 92% 171 Pts	4-Core 547 8-Core 1,050 95% 798 Pts	64-Core 2,195 136% 2,195 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	68.3% Good	Lighting 84.8 Reflection 91.5 Parallax 79.7 69% 85.3 fps	MRender 88 Gravity 77.6 Splatting 79.6 67% 81.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HDWD240 4TB 4,401 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 3.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: KQ000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 141 130 124 143 155 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 172 Write 176 Mixed 66 SusWrite 136 31% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.6 6% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 20%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 931GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1761 1760 1436 1167 1180 1179 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	296% Outstanding	Read 2,040 Write 1,838 Mixed 1,502 SusWrite 1,414 381% 1,698 MB/s	4K Read 48.6 4K Write 185 4K Mixed 64.5 254% 99.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,236 DQ Write 1,065 DQ Mixed 1,148 861% 1,150 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 296% Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 931GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1869 1871 1409 1197 1204 1204 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	289% Outstanding	Read 1,938 Write 1,854 Mixed 1,481 SusWrite 1,459 378% 1,683 MB/s	4K Read 48.1 4K Write 157 4K Mixed 61.8 235% 89.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,217 DQ Write 1055 DQ Mixed 1,137 852% 1,136 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 289% Great: 372%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 28GB free Firmware: 0915 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 158 Write 136 Mixed 97.4 97% 130 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1 635% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GB 14,281 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36% Below average	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 9.8 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 10.7 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 86 46% 86 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	179x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	133x
Core i9-7900XIntel $462Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	68x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $1,145

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16