Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 12 '21 at 01:12
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$118 93,718 User benchmarks, average bench 68% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Memory 54.7 1-Core 90.7 2-Core 169 58% 105 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 586 52% 443 Pts	64-Core 604 37% 604 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics 47,368 User benchmarks, average bench 16% AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.4.1 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Lighting 21.9 Reflection 16.7 Parallax 32.9 18% 23.8 fps	MRender 10.2 Gravity 26.1 Splatting 15.9 14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Reeinno XL120GB M1S3 120GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 254 257 258 134 82 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Read 457 Write 241 Mixed 251 SusWrite 204 64% 289 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 72.8 4K Mixed 20.3 104% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 29.8 57% 111 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 214GB free Firmware: HP63 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 104 104 103 103 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 100 Write 105 Mixed 69.3 SusWrite 104 70% 94.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.1 185% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 70%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 21GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 46 45 46 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Read 43.7 Write 40.5 Mixed 34.8 SusWrite 45.9 30% 41.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KZ24UE1G08TZH8 Kingston 9905678-105.A00G 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	73.5% Very good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 26.6 80% 28 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 17.1 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,880 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	331x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	324x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $85Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	281x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	224x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	192x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	171x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	163x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	66x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	59x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	60x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	56x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $233

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16