Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive	339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210320
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 14 '21 at 10:29
Run Duration	417 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Memory 93.9 1-Core 166 2-Core 326 106% 195 Pts	4-Core 634 8-Core 1,233 111% 934 Pts	64-Core 2,238 138% 2,238 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 108%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 362GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1813 995 779 779 756 784 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	339% Outstanding	Read 2,644 Write 1,957 Mixed 1,713 SusWrite 984 407% 1,824 MB/s	4K Read 75.2 4K Write 194 4K Mixed 104 350% 124 MB/s	DQ Read 1,510 DQ Write 1,392 DQ Mixed 1,394 1,062% 1,432 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 339% Great: 340%
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80 15,656 User benchmarks, average bench 339% 931GB free Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3943 3988 3495 4006 3981 3227 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	489% Outstanding	Read 2,347 Write 3,397 Mixed 2,357 SusWrite 3,773 674% 2,969 MB/s	4K Read 51.7 4K Write 252 4K Mixed 93.6 332% 132 MB/s	DQ Read 1,525 DQ Write 1,298 DQ Mixed 1,511 1,105% 1,444 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 489% Great: 491%
Seagate Expansion Desk 16TB 282 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 243 238 239 237 240 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	Read 224 Write 215 Mixed 138 SusWrite 239 46% 204 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 11.5 4K Mixed 1.2 43% 12 MB/s	DQ Read 6.6 DQ Write 9.5 DQ Mixed 1.7 3% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 38%
Seagate Expansion Desk 16TB 282 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 9TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 239 237 240 241 242 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	37.2% Below average	Read 244 Write 222 Mixed 147 SusWrite 240 48% 213 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 13.4 4K Mixed 1.5 46% 13.2 MB/s	DQ Read 4 DQ Write 12.9 DQ Mixed 1.6 3% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 38%
Seagate Expansion Desk 14TB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 9TB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 252 253 251 247 247 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 266 Write 252 Mixed 181 SusWrite 251 54% 238 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 13.8 4K Mixed 1.2 38% 11.5 MB/s	DQ Read 3.8 DQ Write 19.5 DQ Mixed 3 5% 8.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 38%
Gigabyte GP-AG41TB 1TB 9,949 User benchmarks, average bench 306% 931GB free Firmware: EGFM13.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3261 983 984 985 979 984 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	342% Outstanding	Read 2,310 Write 3,830 Mixed 2,385 SusWrite 1,363 559% 2,472 MB/s	4K Read 53.3 4K Write 236 4K Mixed 92.7 324% 127 MB/s	DQ Read 1,550 DQ Write 1,420 DQ Mixed 1,498 1,120% 1,489 MB/s
Poor: 191% ↑ This bench: 342% Great: 473%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 168 176 178 183 178 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Read 115 Write 154 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 176 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 76GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 78 76 77 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 48.2 Write 92.5 Mixed 75.9 SusWrite 78.2 55% 73.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 97% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB 11,505 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	136% Outstanding	MC Read 62.6 MC Write 46 MC Mixed 44.7 146% 51.1 GB/s	SC Read 32.7 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 41.6 97% 33.8 GB/s	Latency 60 67% 60 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 136% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,767 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $193

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,634x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,258x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $150Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,408x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,233x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,071x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,465x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,834x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,104x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	863x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	769x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	645x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $933

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16