Asrock Z370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory53.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171130
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateMay 17 '21 at 05:00
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 10600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 84.1
1-Core 135
2-Core 245
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 844
80% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,069
66% 1,069 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 153
Parallax 154
125% 153 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 134
Splatting 117
116% 146 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T3XHC-00SJG0 1TB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1379 717 715 701 693 674 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,995
Write 1,738
Mixed 1568
SusWrite 813
342% 1,528 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 52.9
169% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 1,055
DQ Write 92.9
DQ Mixed 219
249% 456 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 208%
Great: 334%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
112GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 134 189 218 210 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 359
Write 306
Mixed 225
SusWrite 192
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 38.5
4K Mixed 32.2
112% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 81.9
DQ Mixed 167
122% 165 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 108 105 105 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 57.7
Write 60.9
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 107
52% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 142 147 143 144 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 75.1
Write 130
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 144
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
195% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2A2666C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.5% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 22.1
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 23.9
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 Taichi Builds (Compare 973 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Taichi - $330

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,134
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback