Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium T4400-$110 7,903 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	Memory 33.3 1-Core 15.6 2-Core 44.2 20% 31 Pts	4-Core 44.3 8-Core 45.2 6% 44.8 Pts	64-Core 46 3% 46 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G102M 667 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 19B4) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.92 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 0.3 Parallax 0.6 1% 0.57 fps	MRender 0.2 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.1 1% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB 12,305 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 98 142 81 104 108 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.1% Poor	Read 144 Write 112 Mixed 131 SusWrite 108 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 10.3 4K Mixed 8.3 32% 9.77 MB/s	DQ Read 28.2 DQ Write 59.1 DQ Mixed 36.6 30% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.37% Terrible	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 2.5 9% 3.07 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 2.5 7% 2.5 GB/s	Latency 236 17% 236 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.37% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium T4300IntelBench 34%, 6,462 samples	8x
Core2 Duo T6500IntelBench 34%, 3,335 samples	4x
Core2 Duo P8400Intel $20Bench 37%, 6,904 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce G102MNvidiaBench 1%, 667 samples	36x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16