Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '21 at 08:10
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$379
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 94.8
1-Core 119
2-Core 265
91% 160 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 686
75% 580 Pts
64-Core 689
46% 689 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60% Good
Lighting 75.5
Reflection 77.4
Parallax 70.8
61% 74.6 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 73.8
Splatting 69.8
59% 70.7 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 237 197 199 194 207 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 1,054
Write 648
Mixed 447
SusWrite 236
132% 596 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 43.2
151% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 428
DQ Write 582
DQ Mixed 244
257% 418 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 126%
Great: 356%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$210
1GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 471
Write 355
Mixed 410
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 56
186% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 348
265% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 131%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$268
393GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 383 381 385 383 383 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 340
Write 225
Mixed 249
SusWrite 382
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 54.4
179% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 189
159% 230 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 104%
Great: 126%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$59
201GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 73 76 74 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 80.7
Write 79.8
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 74.3
57% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 78%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 050B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 160 162 163 163 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 128
Write 103
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 161
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 91%
MAXTOR S TM3500630AS 500GB
334GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.5% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 40.9
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 37.6
50% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 18%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
835GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 5.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 40.7
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 5
39% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 19%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
860GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 89 88 88 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 82.8
Write 83.8
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 88.3
108% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 60%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 82 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 92.3
Write 91.7
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 82.5
113% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$207
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 28.2
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 42
SC Mixed 29.2
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 57.6
69% 57.6 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 8,147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,153
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $268Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $304Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback