Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	0.27% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5500 7,497 User benchmarks, average bench 37% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	Memory 42.1 1-Core 20.9 2-Core 34 23% 32.3 Pts	4-Core 32.2 8-Core 41.3 5% 36.8 Pts	64-Core 38.3 2% 38.3 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 83BE) 1GB CLim: 910 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.33% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 18.4 Parallax 7.8 0% 8.8 fps	MRender 15.9 Gravity 11.6 Splatting 0.1 6% 9.2 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 2.33% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Xraydisk 256GB 256GB 1,063 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: 190507 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 2.3 2.1 2.7 2.6 2.4 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	0.27% Terrible	Read 2.5 Write 1.7 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 2.6 0% 2.12 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 0.27% Great: 156%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	7.24% Terrible	MC Read 2.4 MC Write 1.9 MC Mixed 2.1 6% 2.13 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 1.3 SC Mixed 2.2 5% 1.83 GB/s	Latency 193 21% 193 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 7.24% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	33x
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	24x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	22x

GPU
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	50x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	16x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	14x

SSD
CS900 240GBPNY $22Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	5x
Premier Pro SP900 128GBAdata $40Bench 69%, 2,820 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $131

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16