Asrock X470 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X470 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200110
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 21 '21 at 13:54
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$296
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 83.9
1-Core 137
2-Core 272
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 854
85% 677 Pts
64-Core 1,392
93% 1,392 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$790
Nvidia(10DE 1E87) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 165
Parallax 170
138% 168 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 140
Splatting 123
117% 144 fps
Poor: 110%
This bench: 128%
Great: 140%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$200
751GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 478 461 459 439 460 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 485
Mixed 439
SusWrite 455
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 57.9
194% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 348
268% 364 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$389
323GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 484 482 481 490 478 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 489
Mixed 433
SusWrite 476
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 64
215% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 373
281% 375 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 133%
Great: 132%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$90
169GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 277 277 278 279 278 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 307
Mixed 357
SusWrite 294
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 57.3
197% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 233
212% 324 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 115%
Great: 116%
Samsung 840 Evo 750GB-$310
318GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 476 409 408 408 409 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 488
Mixed 391
SusWrite 425
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 59.2
203% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 248
220% 331 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 126%
Great: 126%
Adata S102 USB 3.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 312a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 67.2
Write 18.9
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 18.9
34% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 34.2
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 32.6
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X470 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,219
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback