MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive331% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '21 at 23:25
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$309
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 82.1
1-Core 141
2-Core 279
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 957
94% 749 Pts
64-Core 1,457
98% 1,457 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$400
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 146
Parallax 197
102% 156 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 135
Splatting 97.9
107% 117 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 104%
Great: 115%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Pm981a NVMe Samsung 1024GB
877GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15303129 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1676 1449 1441 1451 1475 1510 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
331% Outstanding
Read 2,512
Write 2,498
Mixed 1,885
SusWrite 1,500
471% 2,099 MB/s
4K Read 60.2
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 86.4
282% 99.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,320
DQ Write 966
DQ Mixed 1,105
836% 1,130 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 331%
Great: 329%
Shgs31-1 000GS-2 1TB
783GB free
Firmware: 9000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 454 447 450 449 445 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 444
Mixed 419
SusWrite 450
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 42.9
145% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 205
154% 206 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
2E256-TU2-510B00 200GB
719GB free
Firmware: UIO6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 820 859 802 791 790 812 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 64%
Intel SS DSC2BW180A3L 180GB
168GB free
Firmware: LE1i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 175 175 175 175 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 340
Write 211
Mixed 248
SusWrite 169
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 38.7
150% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 201
154% 211 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 84%
Hitachi HMS 5C4040BLE640 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: MPAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 130 129 128 129 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 122
Write 128
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 128
72% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72%
Great: 74%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 1TB
843GB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 189 189 189 189 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 181
Write 140
Mixed 89.6
SusWrite 187
198% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
82% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.5
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 39
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 8,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 175%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $370

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $2,350
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback