Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	91.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 24 '21 at 07:01
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$101 93,718 User benchmarks, average bench 68% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Memory 55.6 1-Core 83.6 2-Core 165 56% 101 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 590 55% 457 Pts	64-Core 609 38% 609 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91.3% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 108 Parallax 110 93% 111 fps	MRender 137 Gravity 101 Splatting 94.7 89% 111 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Reeinno XL120GB M1S3 120GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 234 198 81 81 78 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 444 Write 245 Mixed 248 SusWrite 152 60% 272 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 54 4K Mixed 18.5 89% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 30.7 60% 117 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 87GB free Firmware: HP63 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 89 89 88 89 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Read 84.6 Write 84.5 Mixed 59.3 SusWrite 88.1 58% 79.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 70%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 21GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 47 46 47 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Read 39.8 Write 46.2 Mixed 40.1 SusWrite 46.6 32% 43.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KZ24UE1G08TZH8 Kingston 9905678-105.A00G 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	75.9% Very good	MC Read 29.6 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 27.9 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 18.8 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 141 28% 141 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	331x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	324x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	282x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	224x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	192x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	171x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	163x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	66x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $36Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	59x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	60x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	57x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $233

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16