Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8054
Memory	3.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161101
Uptime	16.1 Days
Run Date	May 31 '21 at 09:33
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	69%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 82.7 2-Core 150 63% 105 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 496 48% 394 Pts	64-Core 524 32% 524 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 80%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GB 5,580 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAV01H3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 40 37 37 39 37 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.7% Below average	Read 256 Write 129 Mixed 70 SusWrite 37.8 27% 123 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 27.8 4K Mixed 15.3 56% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 47 DQ Mixed 53.9 54% 91.6 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 122%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	65.2% Good	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 25 MC Mixed 20.2 68% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 17.6 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	1,777x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	211x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	163x

RAM
HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 2x4GBHynixBench 68%, 8,569 samples	103x
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 6,175 samples	100x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples	76x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $95

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16