Asus X99-M WS/SE

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-M WS/SE (all builds)
Memory	26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190528
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 02 '21 at 16:21
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3 1,203 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 78.8 1-Core 92.9 2-Core 180 68% 117 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 661 59% 501 Pts	64-Core 1,140 71% 1,140 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 372C) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Lighting 38 Reflection 35.7 Parallax 34 31% 35.9 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 35.9 Splatting 24.3 26% 32.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75 52,084 User benchmarks, average bench 200% 879GB free (System drive) Firmware: P2CR031 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 623 608 603 583 583 584 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Read 592 Write 593 Mixed 599 SusWrite 598 134% 595 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 72.1 4K Mixed 46.3 151% 51.2 MB/s	DQ Read 550 DQ Write 411 DQ Mixed 494 366% 485 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 299%
Seagate ST6000VN0011-1UL17Z 6TB 1,358 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 5.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 79 70 83 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 70.9 Write 72.7 Mixed 35.2 SusWrite 78.4 47% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 2x16GB 579 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69% Good	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 23.9 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 19.8 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-M WS/SE Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 86%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS/SE

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	12x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	10x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	6x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	5x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	4x

SSD
MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 14,590 samples	5x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $170Bench 322%, 93,447 samples	4x

RAM
BLE8G4D26AFEA.16FAD 4x8GBCrucialBench 92%, 994 samples	4x
HMA82GR7AFR8N-UH 4x16GBHynixBench 99%, 295 samples	3x
HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF 4x16GBHynixBench 93%, 255 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $615

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16