Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 04 '21 at 00:15
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$41
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 89.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 202
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 416
55% 414 Pts
64-Core 411
25% 411 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 872F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 6.8
5% 5.4 fps
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.45 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV6-8Q256 256GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2881302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 192 186 185 178 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 455
Mixed 408
SusWrite 184
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 48.2
165% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 160
165% 270 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97%
Great: 97%
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB
157GB free
Firmware: EXT09L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 236 254 253 253 253 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 456
Write 255
Mixed 204
SusWrite 248
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 28.7
144% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 74
116% 224 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF1G72AZ-2G3B1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 11.4
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 2,008 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $121

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback