Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	38.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 Mobile Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8783
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210503
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 04 '21 at 17:42
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10850H 6,246 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Memory 89.7 1-Core 137 2-Core 296 94% 174 Pts	4-Core 507 8-Core 731 77% 619 Pts	64-Core 862 53% 862 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 93%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia Quadro T2000 with Max-Q Design 1,016 User benchmarks, average bench 39% HP(103C 8783) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.96 Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	38.5% Below average	Lighting 46.5 Reflection 56.1 Parallax 46.2 38% 49.6 fps	MRender 52 Gravity 44.5 Splatting 49.3 40% 48.6 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 43%
Intel UHD Graphics 187,969 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 8783) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	4.17% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 56 Parallax 5.7 3% 21.9 fps	MRender 6.3 Gravity 4.7 Splatting 9.3 6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.17% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SK hynix PC601 HFS512GD9TNG-L2A0A 512GB 2,673 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 981 606 595 569 555 524 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	182% Outstanding	Read 1,287 Write 1,363 Mixed 1,446 SusWrite 638 267% 1,184 MB/s	4K Read 45.1 4K Write 96.3 4K Mixed 58.2 194% 66.5 MB/s	DQ Read 708 DQ Write 710 DQ Mixed 683 520% 700 MB/s
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 182% Great: 232%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 52GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 294 128 91 93 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 364 Mixed 334 SusWrite 173 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 71 4K Mixed 46 152% 51.1 MB/s	DQ Read 365 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 342 258% 345 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GB 21,753 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	48.5% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 13.8 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	324x
Quadro T2000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 39%, 1,016 samples	143x
Quadro T1000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 36%, 566 samples	100x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	84x
KIOXIA 1TBKxg60znv1t02Bench 208%, 4,378 samples	79x
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples	78x

RAM
HMAA4GS6AJR8N-XN 1x31GBHynixBench 48%, 958 samples	69x
16ATF4G64HZ-3G2E2 1x31GBMicronBench 49%, 283 samples	46x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	42x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16