Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161208
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateJun 05 '21 at 00:46
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$379
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 140
2-Core 226
90% 152 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 600
67% 517 Pts
64-Core 700
47% 700 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$400
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2014 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.1% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 115
Parallax 106
82% 108 fps
MRender 94.6
Gravity 103
Splatting 103
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 88%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
621GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 461 473 479 485 485 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 413
Mixed 412
SusWrite 476
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 64.1
207% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 129%
Great: 135%
WD Green 240GB (2016)
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 64 32 50 83 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 18.4
Write 326
Mixed 370
SusWrite 63.8
45% 195 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 14.4
82% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 75.4
DQ Mixed 0.1
33% 83.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 72%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
193GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 436 439 440 429 387 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 478
Mixed 465
SusWrite 434
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 58.5
202% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 357
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 126%
Great: 135%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Adata 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2473 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.7% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 21
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 15.9
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 2,806 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,153
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback