Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190821
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 05 '21 at 03:31
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 62.1
1-Core 146
2-Core 282
86% 164 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 886
85% 699 Pts
64-Core 1239
77% 1239 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$199
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.5% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 130
Parallax 170
92% 138 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 120
Splatting 83
82% 103 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 297 296 291 290 282 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 405
Write 297
Mixed 272
SusWrite 293
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 36
131% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 166
135% 193 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 129%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74
696GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1617 1672 1631 1654 1667 1696 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 1,852
Write 1,814
Mixed 1,716
SusWrite 1656
397% 1,760 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 68.2
242% 92.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1325
DQ Write 1,118
DQ Mixed 1,218
914% 1,220 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 304%
Great: 347%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$358
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 415 413 413 413 413 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 384
Mixed 369
SusWrite 413
91% 402 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 42.7
129% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 202
152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 137%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
636GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 67 54 60 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 130
Write 128
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 85.9
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
148GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 127 130 131 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 126
Write 125
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 130
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 23.4
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 16.3
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $602
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback