Asus H61M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H61M-E  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '21 at 17:44
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$115
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 197
77% 130 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 292
40% 289 Pts
64-Core 278
19% 278 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.6% Above average
Lighting 71.1
Reflection 82.6
Parallax 72.7
58% 75.5 fps
MRender 77.2
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 64.4
58% 70.7 fps
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 68%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$45
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 52 44 69 64 63 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.1% Very poor
Read 115
Write 58.4
Mixed 164
SusWrite 55.5
22% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 8.8
26% 8.93 MB/s
DQ Read 52
DQ Write 31.5
DQ Mixed 22.1
22% 35.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$37
930GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 209 213 209 212 211 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 135
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 210
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 113%
Great: 112%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB
13GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 20 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 18.2
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 18.8
29% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.8
124% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 04CB MI64C1D1629Z1 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.8% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 18.1
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H61M-E Builds (Compare 1,764 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-E - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $308
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $192
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback