Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DANA_MB
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180831
Uptime	2.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '21 at 17:12
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	JAM-User
Background CPU	28%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 84 1-Core 117 2-Core 227 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 373 8-Core 545 57% 459 Pts	64-Core 686 42% 686 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 86%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1A58 2001) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6294 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.61% Terrible	Lighting 6.4 Reflection 65.6 Parallax 6.7 5% 26.2 fps	MRender 6.3 Gravity 6.1 Splatting 10 6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.61% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q) 36,643 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Device(1A58 2001) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1670 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.63 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Lighting 56.8 Reflection 65.6 Parallax 60.2 46% 60.9 fps	MRender 67.5 Gravity 59.1 Splatting 59.3 50% 62 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 48%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
APS-SE20G-512 512GB 784 User benchmarks, average bench 187% 205GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM13.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 831 690 644 559 621 581 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	165% Outstanding	Read 979 Write 1,268 Mixed 1,025 SusWrite 654 222% 982 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 88.5 4K Mixed 47.9 151% 54.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1052 DQ Write 706 DQ Mixed 783 610% 847 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 165% Great: 267%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 629GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 116 120 120 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 62.2 Write 112 Mixed 51.8 SusWrite 117 63% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.1 210% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 70%
Generic Mass-Storage 128GB 576 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 51GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 16 17 18 18 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 14.5 Write 16.7 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 17.2 22% 16 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 2.7 180% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	60.8% Good	MC Read 24 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 19.5 63% 21.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 18 44% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,059x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,066x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,444x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	595x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	397x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	816x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	248x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,752x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	371x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16