Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 days ago, 4 days ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 07 '21 at 20:44
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 88%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$350
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 67.4
1-Core 136
2-Core 266
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 790
82% 641 Pts
64-Core 1,361
91% 1,361 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$510
PNY(196E 133D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3576 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
123% Outstanding
Lighting 159
Reflection 154
Parallax 157
129% 157 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 135
Splatting 118
115% 148 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 123%
Great: 126%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$145
673GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1516 932 1106 997 982 976 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,220
Write 1,384
Mixed 1170
SusWrite 1,085
274% 1,215 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 99.1
4K Mixed 36.5
142% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,212
DQ Write 1,030
DQ Mixed 1,117
838% 1,119 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 208%
Great: 338%
Hfs128g3 9TND-N210A 128GB
2GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 360
Write 133
Mixed 153
47% 215 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 13
47% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 92.2
DQ Mixed 40.1
51% 92.8 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 70%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$85
201GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1443 1144 733 729 710 716 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,478
Write 1,385
Mixed 1,143
SusWrite 912
276% 1,230 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 44.6
151% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,314
DQ Write 977
DQ Mixed 1,202
883% 1,164 MB/s
Poor: 208%
This bench: 212%
Great: 335%
Hitachi HTS 721010A9E630 1TB
250GB free
Firmware: JB0O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 68 68 69 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 109
Write 91.9
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 67.7
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 76%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$64
181GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 104 104 104 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 119
Write 117
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 104
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
68.8% Good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 29.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 17.8
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 21,818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $178

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,161
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $96SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback