Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 96% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 97% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201204
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 07 '21 at 20:44
Run Duration	237 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	88%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Memory 67.4 1-Core 149 2-Core 288 89% 168 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 845 80% 664 Pts	64-Core 1202 74% 1202 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% PNY(196E 133D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3576 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.63 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	120% Outstanding	Lighting 159 Reflection 154 Parallax 157 130% 157 fps	MRender 190 Gravity 135 Splatting 118 117% 148 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74 114,373 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 673GB free (System drive) Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1516 932 1106 997 982 976 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	208% Outstanding	Read 1,220 Write 1,384 Mixed 1170 SusWrite 1,085 274% 1,215 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 99.1 4K Mixed 36.5 142% 54.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,212 DQ Write 1,030 DQ Mixed 1,117 838% 1,119 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 208% Great: 347%
Hfs128g3 9TND-N210A 128GB 147 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2GB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 360 Write 133 Mixed 153 47% 215 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 20.3 4K Mixed 13 47% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 92.2 DQ Mixed 40.1 51% 92.8 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 71%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 201GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1443 1144 733 729 710 716 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	212% Outstanding	Read 1,478 Write 1,385 Mixed 1,143 SusWrite 912 276% 1,230 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 88.9 4K Mixed 44.6 151% 54.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,314 DQ Write 977 DQ Mixed 1,202 883% 1,164 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 212% Great: 355%
Hitachi HTS 721010A9E630 1TB 1,664 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 250GB free Firmware: JB0O SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 68 68 69 68 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Read 109 Write 91.9 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 67.7 54% 74.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 76%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$65 16,938 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 181GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 104 104 104 103 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 119 Write 117 Mixed 79.1 SusWrite 104 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE1 2x16GB 2,189 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	68.8% Good	MC Read 28.8 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 29.4 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 17.8 46% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,305x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $150Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	868x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	833x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	569x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	514x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	402x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	339x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	271x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $940

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16