Acer Aspire TC-780

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	63.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire TC-780 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire TC-780(KBL)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171012
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '21 at 02:01
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$110 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 78.3 1-Core 94.1 2-Core 194 69% 122 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 304 40% 299 Pts	64-Core 273 17% 273 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	63.5% Good	Lighting 84.1 Reflection 113 Parallax 68.5 68% 88.7 fps	MRender 60.9 Gravity 73.7 Splatting 62.7 54% 65.8 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB 39,780 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30001P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 170 103 62 61 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	59% Above average	Read 317 Write 168 Mixed 186 SusWrite 107 43% 195 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 54.1 4K Mixed 20.9 88% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 186 170% 261 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 83%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 520GB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 347 345 360 367 372 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Read 401 Write 403 Mixed 352 SusWrite 341 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 65.2 4K Mixed 35.2 115% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 354 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 326 245% 327 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 121%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	56.5% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 19.2 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 15.8 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire TC-780 Builds (Compare 1,580 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-780

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	866x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	232x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	191x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	328x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	174x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	161x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	38x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	32x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	32x

RAM
ACR24D4U7S8MB-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 39%, 2,540 samples	87x
AM2P24HC4U1-B9QS AM2P24HC8T1-BUSS 12GBAdataBench 56%, 513 samples	69x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 7,235 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $110

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16