Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Compaq nx7400 (RH673ES#AKD) (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 30A2
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20061023
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '21 at 20:16
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 T5500-$18 1,616 User benchmarks, average bench 32% U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Memory 57.7 1-Core 18.1 2-Core 32.8 27% 36.2 Pts	4-Core 33.6 8-Core 33.9 4% 33.8 Pts	64-Core 34.3 2% 34.3 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST9120821AS 120GB 605 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 7.24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 17 29 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	8.12% Terrible	Read 8.3 Write 12.3 Mixed 9.6 SusWrite 20 9% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 30% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.12% Great: 23%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 6GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 7.4 8.2 8.3 5.2 7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 31.6 Write 12.2 Mixed 12.3 SusWrite 7.9 18% 16 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1 82% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 3 9% 3.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 3.1 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16