| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP 750-414 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | HP 828A |
| Memory | 4.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160919 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 11 '21 at 01:41 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 35% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.2%
Good
|
67% 118 Pts
|
37% 278 Pts
|
17% 268 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
MSI(1462 8D97) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42%
Average
|
44% 53.3 fps
|
38% 47.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 104 103 93 87 94 MB/s
|
45.8%
Average
|
38% 170 MB/s
|
58% 20.3 MB/s
|
139% 208 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
61GB free
Firmware: AX003M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 62 59 61 60 60 MB/s
|
32.9%
Below average
|
35% 47.5 MB/s
|
83% 0.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ramaxel RMUA5120MB86H9F-2400 Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 12GB
2400, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
|
56.7%
Above average
|
59% 20.7 GB/s
|
41% 14.4 GB/s
|
42% 94.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 750-414 Builds (Compare 66 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 750-414
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 65x |
| Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 33x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 3x |
| GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $79 |