Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_X509JA

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	5.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_X509JA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509JA
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201224
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '21 at 15:16
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	83%

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1035G1 53,170 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Memory 81.1 1-Core 132 2-Core 262 87% 159 Pts	4-Core 456 8-Core 604 67% 530 Pts	64-Core 567 35% 567 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 68,603 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 1EC1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	5.76% Terrible	Lighting 7.6 Reflection 6.8 Parallax 8.2 6% 7.53 fps	MRender 11.8 Gravity 8.5 Splatting 0.3 5% 6.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.76% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB 26,870 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80001C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 337 349 342 348 339 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	149% Outstanding	Read 1,076 Write 462 Mixed 428 SusWrite 355 128% 580 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 141 4K Mixed 47.2 200% 76.9 MB/s	DQ Read 539 DQ Write 556 DQ Mixed 420 351% 505 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 153%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 867GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 125 126 127 127 125 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 101 Write 113 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 124 72% 98 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GB 6,259 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2667, 2667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	MC Read 32 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 22.1 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 34.2 SC Mixed 24.1 72% 25.1 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_X509JA Builds (Compare 548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509JA_X509JA

CPU
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	305x
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	208x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	35x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	513x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	35x

SSD
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	71x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GBWDCBench 155%, 2,132 samples	46x
HFM256GDJTNG-831 256GBNvmeBench 128%, 3,461 samples	29x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBSamsungBench 58%, 6,259 samples	176x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	117x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16