Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	97% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z87-D3HP
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF (all builds)
Memory	17.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140812
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '21 at 19:15
Run Duration	444 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670-$52 49,019 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Memory 86.7 1-Core 102 2-Core 208 76% 132 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 404 55% 411 Pts	64-Core 415 26% 415 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 3752) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2789 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.63 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 164 Parallax 155 93% 144 fps	MRender 122 Gravity 152 Splatting 118 106% 130 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 97% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 118 77 55 6 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 498 Write 426 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 102 57% 260 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 7.3 4K Mixed 0.3 55% 13.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 92%
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 25GB free Firmware: 2CV102M3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 72 81 80 79 82 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 251 Write 83.1 Mixed 114 SusWrite 76.9 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 63.1 4K Mixed 12.1 82% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 80.4 DQ Mixed 86.8 75% 113 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 44%
Sandisk X400 2.5 7MM 128GB 1,555 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 9GB free Firmware: X4152012 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 491 Write 319 Mixed 343 85% 384 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 52.7 184% 68.5 MB/s	DQ Read 338 DQ Write 273 DQ Mixed 232 194% 281 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 90%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 5GB free Firmware: M6CR013 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 501 Write 450 Mixed 12.7 70% 321 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 19.8 79% 20.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8 512GB 6,470 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 6GB free Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,398 Write 655 Mixed 837 212% 963 MB/s	4K Read 59.5 4K Write 172 4K Mixed 78.1 281% 103 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 812 DQ Mixed 346 328% 497 MB/s
Poor: 99% Great: 200%
Jmicron Tech 500GB 1,136 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 375GB free Firmware: 0509 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 2.6 3.1 2.7 2.8 2.5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Write 3 Mixed 6.2 SusWrite 2.7 3% 3.97 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 40% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 65%
Jmicron Tech 750GB 209 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 214GB free Firmware: 0509 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 9.7 7.8 7.9 7.7 7.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 35 Write 40.5 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 8.2 21% 28.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 63%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 677 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 161GB free, PID 0202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 78 77 78 77 77 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	29.8% Poor	Read 60.4 Write 45.4 Mixed 29.8 SusWrite 76.2 71% 53 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 44%
Mass Storage Device 320GB 2,915 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 94GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 11 11 12 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	4.84% Terrible	Read 9.7 Write 10.2 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 11.1 14% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.5 29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 4.84% Great: 20%
ST312002 6AS 120GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 43GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.1 9.1 9.4 9.7 10 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11.5% Very poor	Read 34.4 Write 36.8 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 9.5 34% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 14%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 5,109 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 10GB free, PID 0901 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 122 105 80 76 71 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Read 149 Write 117 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 91.5 117% 94.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 32% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 53%
WD My Passport 0837 2TB 1,416 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 48GB free, PID 0837 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 35 36 36 36 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 39 Write 35 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 34.9 45% 33.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 12,078 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 48GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 102 105 105 106 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	43% Average	Read 131 Write 121 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 101 119% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 36% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 52%
WD My Passport 2626 2TB 8,368 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 18GB free, PID 2626 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 87 81 75 71 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 71 Write 84.2 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 79.2 103% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.3 159% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 65%
Hitachi HDP725050GLA360 500GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 72GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.2% Very poor	Read 38.6 Write 38.6 Mixed 29.1 SusWrite 1.3 34% 26.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB 0420 F3-1600C11-8GNT Kingston 99U5471-039.A00LF 24GB 1800, 1800, 1800 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	66.4% Good	MC Read 24.5 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 20.1 67% 23.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 21.9 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z87-D3HP-CF Builds (Compare 807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87-D3HP-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	184x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	158x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	133x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	72x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	52x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	42x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	31x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	24x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	22x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	28x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	21x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $215

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16