Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 122% UFO	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte B365 M AORUS ELITE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '21 at 10:36
Run Duration	278 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400-$161 22,187 User benchmarks, average bench 86% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	83% Excellent	Memory 81.4 1-Core 120 2-Core 217 79% 140 Pts	4-Core 459 8-Core 638 69% 548 Pts	64-Core 649 40% 649 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% MSI(1462 3903) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3525 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	148% Outstanding	Lighting 217 Reflection 201 Parallax 190 177% 202 fps	MRender 186 Gravity 151 Splatting 133 126% 157 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Force MP600 500GB 13,280 User benchmarks, average bench 261% 414GB free (System drive) Firmware: EGFM11.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1077 1152 539 1232 1303 1305 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	213% Outstanding	Read 1,886 Write 1,829 Mixed 1,521 SusWrite 1,101 356% 1,584 MB/s	4K Read 48.6 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 46.6 143% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,089 DQ Write 52.4 DQ Mixed 163 221% 435 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 213% Great: 374%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 405GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 271 324 285 281 282 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	Read 492 Write 204 Mixed 282 SusWrite 283 70% 315 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 48.6 4K Mixed 22.6 119% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 78.5 DQ Mixed 128 120% 196 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 126%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 37GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 273 334 288 274 223 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Read 502 Write 444 Mixed 440 SusWrite 275 93% 415 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 32.7 126% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 54.4 DQ Mixed 134 120% 191 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 419GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 317 316 321 317 313 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 479 Mixed 436 SusWrite 317 98% 434 MB/s	4K Read 45.3 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 60.9 206% 73.1 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 361 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 133%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB (2019)-$300 4,259 User benchmarks, average bench 263% 1TB free Firmware: 102430WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1213 1276 1243 1073 1081 1047 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	205% Outstanding	Read 1,667 Write 1,503 Mixed 588 SusWrite 1,155 275% 1,228 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 39.1 128% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1226 DQ Write 24.6 DQ Mixed 111 209% 454 MB/s
Poor: 183% ↑ This bench: 205% Great: 320%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 114GB free Firmware: 040H SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 155 150 152 150 147 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Read 463 Write 184 Mixed 220 SusWrite 151 56% 254 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 11.1 4K Mixed 13.7 64% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 50.8 DQ Mixed 24.5 36% 68.5 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C20 2x8GB 2,791 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	66.8% Good	MC Read 27 MC Write 24.3 MC Mixed 21.2 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 16.8 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 77.9 51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 2,204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	730x
Core i7-9700Intel $260Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	165x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	162x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	184x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	163x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	125x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	50x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	42x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	199x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	63x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $529

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16