Hyrican H81M-S03

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive28.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHyrican H81M-S03  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI H81M-E34 (MS-7817)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140617
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 13 '21 at 16:09
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$226
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 212
82% 139 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 570
63% 484 Pts
64-Core 581
39% 581 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
62.5% Good
Lighting 76.5
Reflection 92.4
Parallax 80.2
62% 83 fps
MRender 79.9
Gravity 78
Splatting 72
63% 76.6 fps
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 68%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 51 38 38 26 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 366
Write 289
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 62.1
42% 193 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 5.8
30% 9.87 MB/s
DQ Read 28.7
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 17.3
14% 19.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 54%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$69
179GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 80 99 98 80 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 81.3
Write 107
Mixed 15.6
SusWrite 91
53% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 109%
Intenso External USB 3.0 2TB
511GB free
Firmware: 5438
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 41 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 36.5
Write 39.2
Mixed 30
SusWrite 40.1
27% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 77%
Maxtor OneTouch 500GB
431GB free, PID 7310
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 40.4
Write 25.7
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 42.1
46% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 21%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
580GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 94 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 65.7
Write 69.4
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 94
100% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HDS5C4040ALE630 4TB
3TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 80 80 80 80 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
40% Average
Read 112
Write 122
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 80.6
112% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40%
Great: 49%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABB200 2TB
550GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 78 78 79 78 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.4% Below average
Read 75.3
Write 72.9
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 78.4
85% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 34%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
105GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 24 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 26.6
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 24.4
37% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 20%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB
2TB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 52 53 53 53 52 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.3% Average
Read 180
Write 165
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 52.9
152% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
54% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 53%
SAMSUNG SP2014N 200GB
152GB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 53 52 52 51 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.3% Poor
Read 49.2
Write 53.4
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 52
65% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.83 MB/s
XinTop XT-U3Y3502 1TB
379GB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 19 18 18 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.3% Very poor
Read 37
Write 35.3
Mixed 31.4
SusWrite 18.5
40% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 50%
Hitachi HTS727575A9E364 750GB
125GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 17 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 36.7
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 17.9
40% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 19.5
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H81M-S03 Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Hyrican H81M-S03

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $653
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback