PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-F2A88X-D3H (all builds) |
Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20151225 |
Uptime | 5 Days |
Run Date | Jun 14 '21 at 11:00 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
45.7%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk S128G 126GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 159 99 53 78 MB/s
|
33%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
229GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 602 498 423 301 302 304 MB/s
|
147%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
358GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 158 167 167 169 169 MB/s
|
91.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
35.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples | 26x |
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples | 23x |
A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples | 20x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 12x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $326 |