Asrock FM2A55M-VG3+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A55M-VG3+  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150211
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 15 '21 at 19:33
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Memory 51.4
1-Core 23.8
2-Core 42.1
27% 39.1 Pts
4-Core 63.1
8-Core 58.9
8% 61 Pts
64-Core 67.1
4% 67.1 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
4.87% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 2.4
5% 5.63 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 5.3
5% 6.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.87%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 96 50 101 109 112 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.1% Below average
Read 183
Write 108
Mixed 131
SusWrite 103
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 16
60% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 43.9
DQ Write 47.6
DQ Mixed 39
31% 43.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDT721032SLA360 320GB-$26
209GB free
Firmware: ST2OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 89 57 94 95 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 94.7
Write 90
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 86.1
58% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 59%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
39GB free
Firmware: 1AG0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 52 45 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 59.6
Write 66.1
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 53.8
40% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
22.2% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A55M-VG3+ Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A55M-VG3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $172
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback