Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics92.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '21 at 00:12
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$300
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 96.2
1-Core 112
2-Core 222
84% 143 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 601
68% 521 Pts
64-Core 598
40% 598 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$359
Nvidia(10DE 1B82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.3% Outstanding
Lighting 108
Reflection 163
Parallax 96.3
87% 122 fps
MRender 95.3
Gravity 127
Splatting 115
98% 112 fps
Poor: 89%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 106%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 240GB-$65
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 320ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 185 202 206 206 209 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 408
Write 258
Mixed 266
SusWrite 197
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 41.5
169% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 243
186% 252 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 91%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$100
123GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 256 254 254 258 256 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 375
Write 358
Mixed 327
SusWrite 255
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 50.1
166% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 215
164% 221 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 125%
WD WD2500BHTZ-04JCPV0 250GB
26GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 133 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 143
Write 135
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 134
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.7
353% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 109%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
77GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 121 120 120 120 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 132
Write 123
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 120
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.6
316% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
196GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 92 88 95 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 105
Write 83.3
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 92.2
53% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
95% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 108%
WD WD20EFAX-68FB5N0 2TB
170GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 102 102 100 102 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 44% Great: 108%
JetFlash Transcend 64GB
32GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 10 11 9.8 11 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
6.76% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 7.2
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 10.4
15% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.76%
Great: 32%
WD My Passport 2TB
587GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 102 104 103 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 62.7
Write 69.7
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 103
96% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 43%
HP Portable HD BB07 1TB
293GB free, PID bb07
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 70 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 86.5
Write 86.7
Mixed 46
SusWrite 69.4
96% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
69.7% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 21.5
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 23.8
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 53.3
75% 53.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 1: 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 25% 4 110 4 60 27" 2560 1440 PHL08C5 Philips 272P4
History:
Typical MAXIMUS VI FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $1,190
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback