Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	2.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190527
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Jun 17 '21 at 09:46
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	45%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 99.2 1-Core 79.9 2-Core 180 72% 120 Pts	4-Core 272 8-Core 414 42% 343 Pts	64-Core 307 19% 307 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.27 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	58.5% Above average	Lighting 74.9 Reflection 73.5 Parallax 67.7 61% 72 fps	MRender 74.7 Gravity 67.8 Splatting 57.8 54% 66.8 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN500 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$37 14,368 User benchmarks, average bench 189% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: 201000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 580 Write 671 Mixed 576 136% 609 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 66 4K Mixed 34.7 121% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 910 DQ Write 400 DQ Mixed 548 435% 619 MB/s
Poor: 133% Great: 228%
Team T253X2001T 1TB 11,283 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 130GB free Firmware: V1.2.4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 274 253 244 211 208 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Read 302 Write 313 Mixed 284 SusWrite 249 65% 287 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 49.3 4K Mixed 17.7 83% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 267 DQ Write 279 DQ Mixed 250 194% 266 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GB 7,481 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 19.6 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 18.4 SC Mixed 17.4 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 39.9 100% 39.9 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 13: 1R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
13%	6%	85	33	7	144	27"	1920 1080	AOC2701 27G1G4

History:

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B360M-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-E GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	300x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	155x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	124x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	81x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	71x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	70x

SSD
BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP250CM30001 250GBSeagateBench 150%, 932 samples	38x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	34x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
IRH2666D464L19S/8G 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 630 samples	85x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	58x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	47x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 113% - Outstanding

Total price: $218

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16