Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics24.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '21 at 09:55
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 175
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 334
34% 278 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
Asus(1043 0493) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Lighting 31.8
Reflection 33.3
Parallax 40.2
26% 35.1 fps
MRender 28.7
Gravity 29.3
Splatting 22.4
22% 26.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk U110 128GB-$69
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U220000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 30 20 18 20 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 301
Write 72.9
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 37.6
23% 108 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 7.4
38% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 32.6
DQ Write 15.2
DQ Mixed 14.8
13% 20.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 51%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
710GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 163 165 173 173 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 178
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 164
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 107%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 64GB
56GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 14 13 12 12 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
9.21% Terrible
Read 37.2
Write 16
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 12.2
19% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.21%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
32.1% Below average
MC Read 10
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.6
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 10.5
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 22" 1280 720 GSM56B3 W2241
Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $324
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback