Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAsus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '21 at 09:55
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$98
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 183
73% 121 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 352
40% 309 Pts
64-Core 358
24% 358 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
Asus(1043 0493) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
24.7% Poor
Lighting 31.8
Reflection 33.3
Parallax 40.2
26% 35.1 fps
MRender 28.7
Gravity 29.3
Splatting 22.4
24% 26.8 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 26%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk U110 128GB-$69
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U220000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 30 20 18 20 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 301
Write 72.9
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 37.6
23% 108 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 7.4
38% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 32.6
DQ Write 15.2
DQ Mixed 14.8
13% 20.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 51%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$42
710GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 163 165 173 173 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 178
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 164
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 107%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 64GB
56GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 14 13 12 12 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
9.21% Terrible
Read 37.2
Write 16
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 12.2
19% 17.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.21%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
32.1% Below average
MC Read 10
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.6
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 10.5
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 22" 1280 720 GSM56B3 W2241
Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 3,650 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $333
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback