Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '21 at 18:42
Run Duration378 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$450
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 79
1-Core 133
2-Core 236
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 818
80% 642 Pts
64-Core 1,093
73% 1,093 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Gigabyte(1458 404C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
160% Outstanding
Lighting 228
Reflection 212
Parallax 221
184% 220 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 156
Splatting 138
132% 165 fps
Poor: 120%
This bench: 160%
Great: 165%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$110
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,941
Write 1,697
Mixed 679
387% 1,772 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 65.2
247% 92.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,266
DQ Write 458
DQ Mixed 966
686% 896 MB/s
Poor: 236% Great: 418%
Samsung 840 250GB-$199
5GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 44 46 43 43 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 294
Write 76.2
Mixed 97.4
SusWrite 44.5
28% 128 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 22.1
99% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 64.4
DQ Mixed 34.8
53% 104 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 85%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$120
163GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 368 305 288 249 231 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 446
Mixed 392
SusWrite 313
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 55.8
183% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 159
131% 187 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 105%
Great: 133%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
112GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 212 207 196 184 193 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
67% Good
Read 369
Write 362
Mixed 350
SusWrite 204
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 30
98% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 91.2
101% 170 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67%
Great: 100%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
8GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 363
Write 356
Mixed 341
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 29.2
95% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 91.1
100% 169 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$80
129GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 129 124 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 154
Write 113
Mixed 77.4
SusWrite 125
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 115%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$45
195GB free
Firmware: 1AA01114
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 72 79 68 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 91
Write 84.9
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 70.3
55% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 64%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB
804GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 75 79 83 76 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 83.5
Write 111
Mixed 89
SusWrite 75.7
67% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.7
236% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 68%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB
8.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 180 182 182 189 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 187
Mixed 199
SusWrite 183
258% 186 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 1.3
375% 7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.8
DQ Write 8.7
DQ Mixed 1.5
350% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 105%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
205GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 79 77 78 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 108
Write 105
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 78.1
117% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 60%
WD Elements SE 25FE 1TB
173GB free, PID 25fe
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 94 95 95 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 66.7
Write 65
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 94.5
101% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
113% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 66%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1TB free, PID a102
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 85 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 92
Write 87.2
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 85
99% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 33.6
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 32.3
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 111 8 30 27.5" 2560 1440 SAM0E00 U28H75x
History:
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 24,919 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 177%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 205%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $325

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,612
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback