Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime4 Days
Run DateJun 19 '21 at 12:08
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 213
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 637
64% 507 Pts
64-Core 850
57% 850 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.8% Above average
Lighting 65.9
Reflection 72.4
Parallax 67.4
53% 68.6 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 70.5
Splatting 64.6
56% 67.5 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$29
5GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 472
Write 288
Mixed 329
80% 363 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 30.1
126% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 172
155% 230 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 99%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.M0300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 45 33 50 45 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 61.6
Write 57.6
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 42.3
39% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 28.4
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 23.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 61: 7R 6G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
61% 16% 129 308 240 60 23.5" 1920 1080 SAM0D20 S24F350
History: Score 43: 4R 5G 8B | Score 50: 5R 6G 7B | Score 61: 7R 6G 8B
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 28,323 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $62

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $535
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback