Asrock 990FX Killer/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics78.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Killer/3.1  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160114
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateJun 20 '21 at 10:41
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 131
60% 95.7 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 429
40% 330 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
Asus(1043 0555) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.3% Very good
Lighting 98.6
Reflection 106
Parallax 162
80% 122 fps
MRender 88.7
Gravity 115
Splatting 74.7
74% 92.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 240GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0719A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 334 302 105 54 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 448
Write 335
Mixed 13.3
SusWrite 143
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 9.47 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 84 84 83 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 118
Write 98
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 83.3
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
806GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 175 172 177 178 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 181
Mixed 105
SusWrite 176
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.9% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 18.2
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 13.6
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 72.3" 1280 720 SECA514 EPSON PJ
Typical 990FX Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $326
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback