Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7010  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 10:21
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 166
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 510
50% 397 Pts
64-Core 508
34% 508 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Dell(1028 0577) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
2.79% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.93 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
2% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.79%
Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Micron_M500_MTFDDAK960MAV 960GB
729GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 298 319 304 316 324 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 411
Write 353
Mixed 301
SusWrite 310
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 19
68% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 26
DQ Mixed 166
124% 173 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 100%
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
419GB free
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 808 801 850 817 843 848 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 401
Write 812
Mixed 913
SusWrite 828
169% 739 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 44.9
147% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 463
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 408
293% 382 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 129%
Great: 180%
WD My Passport 2606 1TB
851GB free, PID 2606
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 26.4
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 13.9
33% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
109% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 73%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
2TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 102 99 98 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 107
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 100
129% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 0.8
278% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 65%
WD My Passport 1TB
789GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 26.4
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 13.9
33% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 46%
WD Elements 2620 5TB
4.5TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 25.8
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 14
32% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
111% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Ramaxel RMR5030EB68F9W1600 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.1
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 16.2
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 18,660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $229
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $390Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback