Lenovo 4176W29

Performance Results

Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 59%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemLenovo 4176W29  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4176W29
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121218
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 24 '21 at 09:02
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-2640M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 86.2
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 146
67% 107 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 52
20% 122 Pts
64-Core 197
13% 197 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 4200M
Legend(17AA 21D3) 1GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
1.59% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 0.7
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.59%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 240GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0510E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 226 70 51 48 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 410
Write 292
Mixed 296
SusWrite 124
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 24.6
76% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 198
167% 241 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
29.3% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 5 4 50 14" 1280 720 LEN40A1
Typical 4176W29 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop 53%
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4176W29

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback