Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	99% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130819
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '21 at 23:19
Run Duration	404 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Memory 96.4 1-Core 122 2-Core 240 87% 153 Pts	4-Core 421 8-Core 663 67% 542 Pts	64-Core 663 41% 663 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 2768) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Lighting 31.5 Reflection 33.3 Parallax 41.3 26% 35.4 fps	MRender 43.2 Gravity 38.9 Splatting 34.8 31% 39 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 250 50 61 56 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	99% Outstanding	Read 457 Write 436 Mixed 355 SusWrite 131 77% 345 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 51.9 183% 65.2 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 248 217% 324 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 126%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 9GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 64 63 64 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	36% Below average	Read 61.6 Write 39 Mixed 51.8 SusWrite 63.5 40% 54 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 62%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 149 Write 150 Mixed 94.5 97% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1 212% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 112%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 976GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 119 122 122 121 122 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 137 Write 134 Mixed 17.9 SusWrite 119 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 108%
Samsung HD102UJ 1TB 534 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 19GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 57 57 56 57 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	Read 55.6 Write 27.7 Mixed 43.7 SusWrite 56.5 34% 45.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 65%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40 25,285 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 53 53 53 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	30% Below average	Read 51.4 Write 34.2 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 52.6 33% 44.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 59%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 2GB free Firmware: CR100-10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 43 43 44 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	20% Poor	Read 25.7 Write 22.8 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 43.7 21% 28 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 44%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 364GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 89 89 88 90 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 88.3 Write 46.7 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 87.7 52% 70.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 62%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB 7,850 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 36GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 7.5 7.4 8.6 8.1 7.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	9.89% Terrible	Read 34.2 Write 3.5 Mixed 19 SusWrite 8 18% 16.2 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 2.1 116% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.89% Great: 18%
Garmin Edge 800 SD Card 2GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 1% 1GB free, PID 2491 Operating at USB 1.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	0.19% Terrible	Read 0.2 Write 0.2 Mixed 0.2 SusWrite 0.4 0% 0.25 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.19% Great: 2%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB 5,095 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1.5TB free, PID 61b5 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 111 111 111 111 111 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 108 Write 85.6 Mixed 64.1 SusWrite 110 122% 91.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GB 7,519 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	85.3% Excellent	MC Read 31 MC Write 32.7 MC Mixed 26.5 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 22.5 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 28.8 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 52.7 76% 52.7 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 11: 2R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
11%	3%	94	141	70	60	27"	2560 1440	DEL407E DELL U2713HM

History: Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 6: 1R 0G 1B | Score 11: 2R 0G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 77%

Battleship

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 63%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME - $580

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	195x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	135x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	39x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	23x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	22x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	17x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	15x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GBCorsairBench 63%, 2,608 samples	13x
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 5,910 samples	12x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $1,180

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16