Asus TUF B365-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	72.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B365-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200629
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '21 at 01:25
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	GTM-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	98.3% Outstanding	Memory 93.4 1-Core 142 2-Core 284 96% 173 Pts	4-Core 555 8-Core 813 85% 684 Pts	64-Core 778 48% 778 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% MSI(1462 C758) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.2% Very good	Lighting 90.7 Reflection 87.7 Parallax 82.1 74% 86.8 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 77.4 Splatting 70.8 69% 86.6 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 734GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 163 158 166 169 168 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	Read 163 Write 150 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 163 100% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 80% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 106%
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB 15,164 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 25 78 76 81 113 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	160% Outstanding	Read 455 Write 349 Mixed 267 SusWrite 98 217% 292 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.4 1,029% 7.6 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 160%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 1x16GB 311 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	47.1% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 13.8 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 15.1 44% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 10: 0R 0G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
10%	31%	32	109	5	144	23.5"	1920 1080	AUS2420 ASUS VG24V

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B365-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 55%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	20x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	12x
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	10x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	6x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	5x

SSD
BarraCuda SSD ZA1000CM10002 1TBSeagateBench 97%, 3,599 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
PLUS 240 GB 240GBSandiskBench 43%, 24,911 samples	3x

RAM
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 76%, 20,001 samples	5x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $335

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16