Asus H170-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H170-PRO (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180516
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 27 '21 at 02:07
Run Duration	266 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100-$76 110,166 User benchmarks, average bench 55% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	55.9% Above average	Memory 59 1-Core 118 2-Core 234 73% 137 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 313 41% 308 Pts	64-Core 314 19% 314 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153 39,178 User benchmarks, average bench 21% PowerColor(148C 2015) 2GB CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Lighting 23.6 Reflection 36 Parallax 32.4 19% 30.7 fps	MRender 30.1 Gravity 23.1 Splatting 24.4 21% 25.9 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC400 512GB-$180 2,804 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 147GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM00.W SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 293 223 287 276 261 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Read 253 Write 53.7 Mixed 295 SusWrite 255 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 79.6 4K Mixed 36.1 129% 47.6 MB/s	DQ Read 322 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 66.7 119% 234 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 108%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$62 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 102GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 89 91 91 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 58 Write 73.3 Mixed 71.9 SusWrite 89.5 54% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 1x8GB-$25 15,315 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	40.4% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 12.9 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.3 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 131 31% 131 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 36: 5R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
36%	33%	30	180	113	85	24"	1920 1080	ACI24E1 VG248

History: Score 25: 2R 3G 6B | Score 42: 6R 2G 6B | Score 36: 5R 3G 2B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H170-PRO Builds (Compare 2,347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 62%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 52%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170-PRO - $105

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	1,088x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	282x
Core i5-6402PIntelBench 68%, 15,913 samples	217x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	271x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	269x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	173x

SSD
Premier SP550 120GBAdata $45Bench 76%, 22,057 samples	172x
SP600 128GBAdataBench 73%, 8,600 samples	81x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	58x

RAM
DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 76%, 26,065 samples	292x
DDR4 2400 2OZ 1x8GBAdataBench 42%, 10,940 samples	117x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	87x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $462

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16