Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_F509FA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_F509FA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X509FA
Memory	1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190828
Uptime	4.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 27 '21 at 20:25
Run Duration	248 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	91%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 5405U 2,193 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Memory 76.4 1-Core 59 2-Core 116 52% 83.8 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 121 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 153 10% 153 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610 3,878 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 1961) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 2.7 Reflection 3.2 Parallax 3.3 2% 3.07 fps	Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.1 0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 2% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GB 6,558 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80001C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 47 52 48 45 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 487 Write 104 Mixed 121 SusWrite 49.6 41% 190 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 55.4 4K Mixed 22.1 89% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 256 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 124 107% 162 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 129%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 801GB free Firmware: JU0C1J SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 89 129 131 131 131 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Read 134 Write 142 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 123 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.6 227% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB 54,777 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	54.1% Above average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 18.7 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 13.7 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 87.5 46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 32: 4R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
32%	9%	127	39	22	60	15.5"	1366 768	CMN15E6

History: Score 8: 0R 2G 2B | Score 32: 4R 2G 6B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_F509FA Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FA_F509FA

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	14x
Pentium 5405UIntelBench 48%, 2,193 samples	5x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	3x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	17x
UHD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 3,878 samples	5x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	7x
RBUSNS8180DS3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 58%, 2,813 samples	2x
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GBBench 95%, 6,558 samples	2x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	13x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	3x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 12GBMicronBench 54%, 204 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16