Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 132% UFO	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 127% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180914
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '21 at 15:22
Run Duration	291 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8086K-$399 38,086 User benchmarks, average bench 91% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 97 1-Core 154 2-Core 307 102% 186 Pts	4-Core 591 8-Core 1071 100% 831 Pts	64-Core 1,326 82% 1,326 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E4) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	126% Outstanding	Lighting 171 Reflection 187 Parallax 180 140% 179 fps	MRender 135 Gravity 181 Splatting 126 119% 147 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 42GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 255 216 168 130 126 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 520 Write 486 Mixed 447 SusWrite 223 94% 419 MB/s	4K Read 46.3 4K Write 131 4K Mixed 64.6 222% 80.7 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 361 272% 365 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 129%
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$140 14,258 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 56GB free Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 182 178 183 167 172 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Read 326 Write 210 Mixed 239 SusWrite 170 53% 236 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 44.4 173% 63.5 MB/s	DQ Read 300 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 210 167% 237 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 88%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,460 Write 1,453 Mixed 1,076 365% 1,663 MB/s	4K Read 65 4K Write 168 4K Mixed 85.8 298% 106 MB/s	DQ Read 978 DQ Write 1,273 DQ Mixed 1,010 795% 1,087 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 140GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 319 319 318 317 317 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 484 Mixed 388 SusWrite 335 96% 430 MB/s	4K Read 49.2 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 66.7 230% 82.5 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 358 270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 124%
Samsung MZYLN256HCHP-000L2 256GB 1,732 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 238GB free Firmware: EMT63L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 290 293 292 292 290 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 292 Mixed 274 SusWrite 291 76% 343 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 45.6 188% 72.4 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 246 209% 308 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 104%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 172GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 493 496 389 284 283 283 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Read 519 Write 494 Mixed 454 SusWrite 371 103% 460 MB/s	4K Read 52.2 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 69.4 238% 84.6 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 361 272% 365 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 178 180 179 182 181 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 143 Mixed 85.1 SusWrite 178 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 12,409 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 39 MC Write 38.9 MC Mixed 27.6 100% 35.2 GB/s	SC Read 23.2 SC Write 45.2 SC Mixed 33 97% 33.8 GB/s	Latency 50.3 80% 50.3 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	25"	1280 720	AOC2577 Q2577W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	4,760x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	1,042x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	478x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1,355x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	809x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	399x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	346x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	295x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	281x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	405x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	329x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	264x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $1,246

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16