Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics80.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 30 '21 at 20:28
Run Duration298 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Memory 28.7
1-Core 20.3
2-Core 40.3
19% 29.8 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 494
34% 317 Pts
64-Core 786
49% 786 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.3% Excellent
Lighting 81.2
Reflection 146
Parallax 173
66% 133 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 162
Splatting 116
108% 133 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$54
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 268 233 286 290 230 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 439
Write 338
Mixed 362
SusWrite 262
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 16.9
60% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 29.4
DQ Mixed 54.5
46% 70.6 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
651GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 270 234 287 293 230 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 441
Write 347
Mixed 347
SusWrite 264
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 13
59% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 46.3
DQ Mixed 43.4
45% 76.4 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
282GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 106 144 185 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 134
Write 116
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 130
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
645GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 127 110 128 114 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 85.7
Write 84.2
Mixed 51.1
SusWrite 119
62% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
374GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 112 102 117 108 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 97.2
Write 87.2
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 106
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
63.3% Good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 30.5
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.6
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 263
15% 263 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 7 5 144 27" 1920 1080 AOC2701 27G1G4
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback