HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	6.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 836B
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180622
Uptime	9.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 03 '21 at 12:12
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Memory 61.8 1-Core 25.3 2-Core 50.7 32% 45.9 Pts	4-Core 93.5 8-Core 137 14% 115 Pts	64-Core 139 9% 139 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% HP(103C 836B) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6230 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	6.78% Terrible	Lighting 7.7 Reflection 8.7 Parallax 9.5 6% 8.63 fps	MRender 14.8 Gravity 8.8 Splatting 6.4 8% 10 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 6.78% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB 8,655 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 164 161 158 162 161 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Read 896 Write 734 Mixed 495 SusWrite 180 128% 576 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 39.2 4K Mixed 31.5 106% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 235 174% 231 MB/s
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 317%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB 71,657 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free Firmware: RDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 124 120 121 128 130 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 81.3 Write 80 Mixed 42.8 SusWrite 123 60% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.6 173% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 859B CT8G4SFS824A.C8FJ 16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	45.6% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 19.1 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 8.8 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 123 33% 123 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	15.5"	1280 720	NCP0029

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx Builds (Compare 2,452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Power Laptop 15-cb0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	1,679x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	771x
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,405x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	982x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	48x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	212x
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	102x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	91x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	240x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	210x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	148x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $33

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16