Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateJul 03 '21 at 19:13
Run Duration418 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 82%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 88.8
1-Core 133
2-Core 247
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 622
64% 515 Pts
64-Core 721
45% 721 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.1% Above average
Lighting 69.3
Reflection 73.5
Parallax 75
56% 72.6 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 66.3
55% 67.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 53 42 27 26 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 1,154
Write 74.5
Mixed 130
SusWrite 41.9
74% 350 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 18.2
86% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 608
DQ Write 75.1
DQ Mixed 114
141% 266 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 236%
OCZ Vector 150 240GB-$246
93GB free
Firmware: 1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 241 263 254 276 266 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 369
Write 322
Mixed 283
SusWrite 264
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 19.3
64% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 45
DQ Mixed 107
101% 167 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 110%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
38GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 126 126 129 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 327
Write 136
Mixed 166
SusWrite 127
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 20.4
73% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 51.6
DQ Mixed 81
70% 108 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 82%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
174GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 239 260 252 274 264 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
70% Good
Read 375
Write 311
Mixed 298
SusWrite 262
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 26.5
95% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 51.8
DQ Mixed 77.6
92% 171 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 70%
Great: 128%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
456GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 26 26 30 28 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 51%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 124 125 117 125 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 119
Write 122
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 119
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
471GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 147 146 147 152 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 146
Write 148
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 145
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.3% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 20
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 20.3
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 2R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 16% 51 333 267 60 27.2" 2194 1234 GSM7706 LG HDR 4K
History: Score 7: 0R 0G 7B | Score 10: 1R 1G 2B | Score 35: 5R 3G 1B | Score 22: 2R 3G 3B
Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $656
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback